Getting married is hell on blogging.
July 17, 2008It’s been more than a while since my last update so I’ll just jump right in.
Couple of thoughts:
On the media: I think it’s funny how much people write about the fact that Murray Chass doesn’t like blogs. Guess what, I don’t like Murray Chass. So who cares? Whether Murray likes blogs or not, is irrelevant. It’s like discussing whether or not dinosaurs like meteors.
On the All Star Game: Expand the rosters to 35. Allow any team with a starting pitcher selected to the team to designate him as officially unavailable, then he gets to dress and hang out, but he can’t pitch and he doesn’t count against the roster.
That isn’t so bad, is it?
On the Fact that the Yankees suck: This will be the first year in what 12, 13 years that I won’t be watching baseball in October. That will be weird. I blame my wife. It’s a perfect correlation. The Yankees have never made the post season in a year in which I have been married. Sorry.
Finally, the fine fellas at FJM linked to a story by Jeffrey Flannagan of the KC Star in which he does a segmentation of sports fans, and one of the segments are stat loving VORPies by any other name. Flannagan calls them (me, us?) MOM’S BASEMENT.
I took it upon myself to hunt down Mr. Flannagan’s e-mail address and fired off the following note.
Mom’s Basement? Seriously?
First off, I love stats, my favorite baseball book is Baseball Between the Numbers. It’s great, you should read it. If you get paid money to write things about baseball, you should really read it. At the same time, my favorite baseball player is Jason Giambi, because he is totally human, and sweaty, and looks like he’d be a good dude to get hammered with. In other words, I’m glad he’s not a computer. I like stats, but I also like the imperfect, quirky cool guys who play the game.
In your attempt at jock humor, you managed to be offensive to those of us who like to understand the game of baseball by evaluating the facts. Well done, you should be very proud of yourself.
While I have a firm grasp on what VORP and WARP3 and EQA are, I will assume that you do not. (By the way, if you are going to make fun of long acronyms, how about the NAACP or the AARP, those are pretty long! What’s that? No? Fine, have it your way.) But, shame on you. You are a sportswriter, it is literally your job to at least know what those pretty simple baseball stats are.
The real problem with your piece though, is the utterly lazy creation of an already lazily created stereotype. You may take shots at my belief that batting average is a stupid statistic, or that pitchers wins are an unfair way to judge a pitcher. But you may not insinuate that my beautiful loft in Chicago, my beautiful wife, and my lack of mom living with me, are figments of my imagination.
If I may steal an arrogant device from Olberman, That sir, is where I draw the line.
Regards,
Steve Bonner. (and his mom) Shut up mom, you’re ruining everything!! (want some soup dear?)
In his defense, Flannagan replied to me in like 15 minutes and said,
Really wasn’t trying to strike a nerve with any of the stat folks. I just
think it can get a little carried away. Stats can be fun, but in the end, if
you want to know if a player is good, trust your eyes. Your eyes know.Loved your email, though, and your sense of humor.
The lesson here is, of course, that I’m funny. Also, Flanagan was nice enough to reply, so there’s that.
Posted by schteeve



